Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.23 seconds)
Idrish Mohammad Khan S/O Ishak Mohammad ... vs Gopinath Hospital Pvt. Ltd. on 27 February, 2020 cites

Kusum Sharma & Ors vs Batra Hospital &Med.Research Centre ... on 10 February, 2010

03. Supreme Court of India civil appeal No. 1385/2001 Decided on 10.02.2010 Kusum Sharma & others Vs. Batra Hospital & medical research centre & others ;g izdj.k fpfdRlh; vlko/kkuh dk gSA ifjoknh dh ukd esa lkW;ul dh leL;k Fkh foi{kh la[;k 1 ds gkWfLiVy esa foi{kh la[;k 2 dks 20-10-2015 dks fn[kk;k rks vkWijs'ku dh lykg nh x;hA fnukad 26-10-2015 dks vkWijs'ku djok;k] tc mldks gks'k vk;k rks mldh nkWfguh vkWa[k dh jks'kuh xk;c Fkh blds ckn ifjokn esa vafdr iSjk la[;k 4] 5] 6 ds fpfdRldksa o vLirkyksa esa fn[kk;k ijUrq mDr vkWa[k esa jks'kuh vkus dh dksbZ mEehn ugha FkhA ifjoknh ds ,d vkWa[k dh jks'kuh pyh x;h rFkk ;g jks'kuh lkW;ul ds vkWijs'ku ds ckn x;hA bl izdkj ifjoknh vius ftEes tks rF; Fks og lkfcr djus esa lQy jgk gSA vc iz'u mRiUu gksrk gS foi{khx.k dk \ bl laca/k esa II (2009) CPJ 61 SC NIZAM INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Vs. PRASANTH S. DHANANKA esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us fuEu fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS %&
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 225 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Nizam'S Institute Of Medical Sciences vs Prasanth S.Dhananka & Ors on 14 May, 2009

03. Supreme Court of India civil appeal No. 1385/2001 Decided on 10.02.2010 Kusum Sharma & others Vs. Batra Hospital & medical research centre & others ;g izdj.k fpfdRlh; vlko/kkuh dk gSA ifjoknh dh ukd esa lkW;ul dh leL;k Fkh foi{kh la[;k 1 ds gkWfLiVy esa foi{kh la[;k 2 dks 20-10-2015 dks fn[kk;k rks vkWijs'ku dh lykg nh x;hA fnukad 26-10-2015 dks vkWijs'ku djok;k] tc mldks gks'k vk;k rks mldh nkWfguh vkWa[k dh jks'kuh xk;c Fkh blds ckn ifjokn esa vafdr iSjk la[;k 4] 5] 6 ds fpfdRldksa o vLirkyksa esa fn[kk;k ijUrq mDr vkWa[k esa jks'kuh vkus dh dksbZ mEehn ugha FkhA ifjoknh ds ,d vkWa[k dh jks'kuh pyh x;h rFkk ;g jks'kuh lkW;ul ds vkWijs'ku ds ckn x;hA bl izdkj ifjoknh vius ftEes tks rF; Fks og lkfcr djus esa lQy jgk gSA vc iz'u mRiUu gksrk gS foi{khx.k dk \ bl laca/k esa II (2009) CPJ 61 SC NIZAM INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Vs. PRASANTH S. DHANANKA esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us fuEu fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS %&
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 565 - Full Document

Smt. Savita Garg vs The Director, National Heart Institute on 12 October, 2004

(2004) 8 SCC page 56 SAVITA GARG (SMT) Vs. DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HEART INSTITUTE esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us fuEu fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS %& D. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Ss. 22, 18, 12 and 13 -Mecical negligence -- Burden of proof -Held, once aclaim petition is filed and the complainant has successfully discharged the initial burden that the hospital/clinic/doctor was negligent, and that as a result of such negligence the patient died, then in that case the burden lies on the hospital and the doctor concened who 8 treatedthe patient to show that there was no negligence involved in the treatment - Reasons for, given - Torts - Medical negligence--Burden of proof ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fu/kkZfjr fl)kUrksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, vc foi{kh dks fl) djuk gS fd mlus iw.kZ Skill ,oa lko/kkuh ls bZykt fd;kA foi{kh la[;k 1 futh vLirky gS rFkk foi{kh la[;k 2 E.N.T. Lis'kfyLV gS blfy, nksuksa foi{khx.k dks High Skill and Care dk mi;ksx djuk gksxkA ;g izdj.k fpfdRlh; vlko/kkuh dk gS bl laca/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds eq[; :i ls nks fu.kZ; gSA bl lac/a k esa (2005) 6 Supreme Court Cases 1 JACOB MATHEW Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND AN OTHER esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us fuEu fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS %& J. Tort -Negligence - Medical Negligence -When actionable - Test for Approach to be taken in dealing with cases of - Rationable for differential treatment of medical profession, discussed in extenso - Duties undertaken by doctors enumerated - Held, in a claim of medical negligence, it is enough for defendant to show that standard of care and skill attained was that of the ordinary competent medical practitioner exercising an ordinary degree of professional skill - Test for medical negligence laid down in Balam case, (1957) 2 All ER 118, 121 D-F [set out in para 19 herein], held, applicable in india -Further explained in detail when deviation from normal medical practice would amount to evidence of medical negligence - various issues clarified as to (1) state of knowledge by which standard of care is to be determined, (2) Standard of care in case of charge of failure (a) to use some particular equipment, or (b) to take some precaution, (3) enquiry to be made when alleged negligence is (a) due to an accident, or (b) due to an error of judgment in choice of a procedure or its execution--Considerations to be kept in mind by any forum trying issue of medical negligence, specified - Medical Practitioners 9 K. Tort -Negligence - Professional negligence--when actionable--Test for--Held, a professional may be held liable for negligence either (1) wnen he was not possessed of the requisite skill which he professed to have possessed, or (2) when he did not exercise, with reasonable competence in the given case, the skill which he did possess--Standard to be applied would be that of an ordinary competent person exercising ordinary skill in that profession--Test for professional negligence laid down in Bolam case, (1957) 2 All ER 118, 121 D-F [set out in para 19 herein], held, applicable in India - Professional negligence distinguished from occupational negligence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 257 - A K Mathur - Full Document
1