Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.84 seconds)
Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors on 11 May, 2005
cites
The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 December, 2004
[See also Andhra Bank Vs. Official Liquidator and Anr., 2005 (3) SCALE
178]
The courts while passing an order of interim injunction must also
consider the parameters of a Public Interest Litigation as laid down by this
Court in Dr. B. Singh Vs. Union of India and Others [(2004) 3 SCC 363]
and Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others [(2005) 1
SCC 590].
Deoraj vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 6 April, 2004
In Deoraj vs. State of Maharashtra and Others [(2004) 4 SCC 697]
this Court opined:
Raunaq International Ltd vs I.V R. Construction Ltd. And Ors on 9 December, 1998
In Raunaq International Ltd. Vs. I.V.R. Construction Ltd. and Others
[(1999) 1 SCC 492], this Court held that in appropriate cases, the petitioners
should be put on appropriate terms such as providing an indemnity or an
adequate undertaking to make good the loss or damage in the event the PIL
filed is dismissed.
Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. & ... vs C.K. Rajan & Others on 14 August, 2003
[See also Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee
and Another Vs. C.K. Rajan and Others, (2003) 7 SCC 546].
Jineshwardas (Dead) Through L. Rs. & Ors vs Smt. Jagrani & Anr on 26 September, 2003
The Courts are also required to consider the decisions of this Court
relating to public interest litigation vis-`-vis reason of delay in bringing the
same as noticed by this Court in Chairman & MD BPL Ltd Vs. S.P.
Gururaja and Others, (2003) 8 SCC 567] in the following terms:
Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union Of India And Others on 18 October, 2000
[See also Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others, (2000)
10 SCC 664 at 762 and R & M Trust Vs. Koramangala Residents Vigilance
Group and Others, (2005) 3 SCC 91 at 112-13]
So far as transactions relating to seven mills belonging to National
Thermal Corporation are concerned, including sale of Jupiter Mills, it is not
in dispute that transactions have reached a final stage. The purchasers of
Jupiter Mills have already paid 16 crores and a sum of Rs. 376 crores would
pass hands if the transaction is completed. If the transactions in respect of
the mills are not allowed to be completed, the scheme framed by the BIFR
would come to a stand still resulting in accrual of interest payable by the
National Textile Corporation to the financial institutions besides other
hardships which may be caused to various other persons including the
workers.
R & M Trust vs Koramangala Resi. Vigilance Group & Ors on 19 January, 2005
[See also Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others, (2000)
10 SCC 664 at 762 and R & M Trust Vs. Koramangala Residents Vigilance
Group and Others, (2005) 3 SCC 91 at 112-13]
So far as transactions relating to seven mills belonging to National
Thermal Corporation are concerned, including sale of Jupiter Mills, it is not
in dispute that transactions have reached a final stage. The purchasers of
Jupiter Mills have already paid 16 crores and a sum of Rs. 376 crores would
pass hands if the transaction is completed. If the transactions in respect of
the mills are not allowed to be completed, the scheme framed by the BIFR
would come to a stand still resulting in accrual of interest payable by the
National Textile Corporation to the financial institutions besides other
hardships which may be caused to various other persons including the
workers.