Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 11 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 August, 1986
Respondent - State of Tamil Nadu has produced a copy of
the decision rendered by a learned Single Judge of the
Madras High Court dated 17-6-1988, in which the identical
question was considered when it arose under Section 5(1) of
the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short "the old
P.C. Act") wherein it was held that "the offence of
acquiring and being in possession of disproportionate assets
can be abetted by another including one who is not a public
servant". It was pointed out by the respondent that the
aforesaid decision was challenged before this Court through
a special leave petition and on 14-12-1988 this Court has
dismissed the said petition. Shri K.K. Venugopal has
rightly contended that dismissal of the special leave
petition will not amount to upholding of the law propounded
in the decision challenged through that special leave
petition. The aforesaid legal position seems to be well
nigh settled. [vide Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. State
of Bihar {1986 (4) SCC 146}]; Union of India vs. All India
Services Pensioners Association {1988 (2) SCC 580}; Supreme
Court Employees Welfare Association vs. Union of India
{1989 (4) SCC 187].