Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.41 seconds)Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 364A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 364 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ramesh Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 25 May, 2002
48. It has to be seen if the above referred
contradictions can be terms as minor contradictions or these
are the contradictions on material points which may create
any doubt about the genuineness of the occurrence under
adjudication. After carefully scrutinizing the evidence
available on record, I am of the view that the principles of law
laid down in Ramesh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (HP),
(supra), Leela Ram (Dead) through Duli Chand v. State of
Haryana, (supra), and Appabhai and another v. State of
SC No.78/10 State Vs. Pradeep Sharma etc. Page 31/43
Gujarat, (supra), are not applicable in the present case.
Mohammad Jasimuddin Ahmed vs State Of Assam on 26 February, 1982
58. I have analyzed the evidence in the light of
principles of law laid down in cases Mohd. Jasimuddin Ahmed
v. State of Assam, (supra), Debiprasad Padhi and another v.
State, (supra), and Sanatan Naskar Vs. State of West Bengal,
(supra). I come to the conclusion that prosecution has failed
to establish five golden principles which are required to be
proved to prove a case based on circumstantial evidence.
Therefore, it would not be safe to convict the accused
persons on the evidence available on record.
Babu Lal And Ors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 October, 2003
I am
of the view that principles of law laid down in case Babu Lal
and Others v. State, are applicable on the facts of present
case. The discrepancies in the testimonies of the prosecution
witnesses particularly mentioned above have created doubt in
the truthfulness of the prosecution case.
Sanatan Naskar & Anr vs State Of West Bengal on 8 July, 2010
59. Fourthly, in a case reported as Sanatan Naskar Vs.
State of West Bengal, (supra), it was held by the Apex court
that: