Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.34 seconds)Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Mahabir Prasad Santuka & Ors vs Collector, Cuttack & Ors on 11 February, 1987
30. Thereafter reliance was placed on a judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Mahabir Prasad Santuka and Ors. v. Collector, Cuttack and Ors., , particularly paragraph 5 thereof which reads as under :
Thakarsibhai Devjibhai And Ors. vs Executive Engineer, Gujarat And Anr. on 11 January, 2001
31. Thereafter reliance was place on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Thakurshibhai Devjibhai v. Executive Engineer, Gujarat and Anr., , particularly paragraph 12 thereof which reads as under :
Raja Srivalgoti Sarvagna Kumara ... vs Special Land Acquisition Officer, City ... on 16 January, 1979
35. Thereafter he has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Krishna Yachendra Bahadurvaru v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board, Bangalore and Ors., , particularly part of paragraph 3 thereof, which reads as under :
Thakur Kamta Prasad Singh (Dead) By L.Rs vs The State Of Bihar on 10 March, 1976
"There is an element of guess-work inherent in most cases involving determination of the market value of the acquired land. But this in the very nature of things cannot be helped. The essential thing is to keep in view the relevant factors prescribed by the Act. If the judgment of the High Court reveals that it has taken into consideration the relevant factors, the assessment of the market value of the acquired land should not be disturbed (see Thakur Kanta Prasad Singh (dead) by L.Rs. v. State of Bihar, . After having been taken through the material on the record, we find no infirmity in the judgment of the High Court as might induce us to disturb its finding. The appeal consequently fails and is dismissed but in the circumstances without costs."
M/S. Shantistar Builders vs Narayan Khimalal Totame And Others on 31 January, 1990
39. The object of the Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976 also came up for consideration before the Apex Court in the case of M/s. Shantistar Builders, v. Narayan Khimalal Totame and Ors., . While considering the object of the Act as well the provisions of exemption under sections 20 and 21 of the ULC Act, the Court has held as under :