Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.28 seconds)
State vs . Rajeev Arora S/O Lt. Ramesh Chand, R/O ... on 16 December, 2009 cites

Om Prakash Goel vs Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development ... on 6 May, 1991

Prosecutor, presented facts on behalf of the State. Sh. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate, had advanced arguments on behalf of the defence. It is submitted by the ld. Counsel for the accused that prosecutrix has given different versions at different times and as such her testimony suffers from inconsistencies and is not reliable. The medical evidence does not corroborate her testimony regarding commission of rape upon her. There ­5­ is unexplained delay in lodging the FIR. Under these circumstances, case is highly suspicious and conviction cannot be based without corroboration, which is lacking in the instant case. As such it was submitted that accused is entitled to be acquitted. He has also placed reliance in Gopal & Ors Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2007 (3) Criminal Court Cases 295 (Rajasthan); Hem Raj & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab, 2004 92) Criminal Court Cases 157 (P&H); Daljit Singh Ghai & Anr. Vs. State, 2004 (2) Criminal Court Cases 158 (Karnatka); Om Prakash Vs. State of H.P., 2000 Cr.L.J. 1591; Niranjan Patra vs. CJM Cuttack, 2000 Cr.L.J. 1600; Kuldeep Mahato vs. State of Bihar, 1998 (2) Apex Court Journal 629 (S.C.); Brijlala Pd. Sinha etc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 106 - S R Pandian - Full Document

Kuldeep K. Mahato vs State Of Bihar on 6 August, 1998

Therefore, her clothes were not seized nor any vaginal samples were taken. Two figures were easily inserted in her vagina. Under these circumstances, this medical evidence does not lead us anywhere. ld. Counsel for the accused has placed reliance on Kuldeep (supra). In that case no injury on the person, including private parts of the prosecutrix was found and it was not case of the prosecutrix that she was under physical restraint. It was held that the circumstances negated forcible intercourse and as such conviction was set-aside.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 60 - Full Document

Rameshwar Dass vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 13 December, 2007

Vs. State of Bihar, 1998 (2) Apex Court Journal 631 (SC); Bibhishan Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 348 (S.C.); Rameshwar Dass Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 349 (S.C.); Ram Rai Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 238 (Rajasthan); Chhajoo Vs. State, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 240 (Allahabad); Anmol Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 177; Santosh vs. State of Haryana, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 179; Dev Raj Vs. State of Haryana, 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 90 (P&H); State of U.P. Vs. Brij Bihari & Anr., 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 95 (Allahabad) (DB); Anath Bandhu Kundu vs. The State of West Bengal and others, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3449; Biren Mandal v. State, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3455; Vinal Suresh Kamble vs. Chaluverapinake Apal S.P. & Anr., 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 28 (S.C.); State of Karnatka vs. M.V. Mahesh, 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 33 (SC); Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana, 2005 (1) RCR (Criminal) 317;
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 12 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Smt. Santosh Yadav vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 1996

Vs. State of Bihar, 1998 (2) Apex Court Journal 631 (SC); Bibhishan Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 348 (S.C.); Rameshwar Dass Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 349 (S.C.); Ram Rai Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 238 (Rajasthan); Chhajoo Vs. State, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 240 (Allahabad); Anmol Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 177; Santosh vs. State of Haryana, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 179; Dev Raj Vs. State of Haryana, 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 90 (P&H); State of U.P. Vs. Brij Bihari & Anr., 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 95 (Allahabad) (DB); Anath Bandhu Kundu vs. The State of West Bengal and others, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3449; Biren Mandal v. State, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3455; Vinal Suresh Kamble vs. Chaluverapinake Apal S.P. & Anr., 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 28 (S.C.); State of Karnatka vs. M.V. Mahesh, 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 33 (SC); Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana, 2005 (1) RCR (Criminal) 317;
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 19 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

Dev Raj vs The State Of Haryana Through Collector ... on 1 August, 1995

Vs. State of Bihar, 1998 (2) Apex Court Journal 631 (SC); Bibhishan Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 348 (S.C.); Rameshwar Dass Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 349 (S.C.); Ram Rai Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 238 (Rajasthan); Chhajoo Vs. State, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 240 (Allahabad); Anmol Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 177; Santosh vs. State of Haryana, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 179; Dev Raj Vs. State of Haryana, 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 90 (P&H); State of U.P. Vs. Brij Bihari & Anr., 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 95 (Allahabad) (DB); Anath Bandhu Kundu vs. The State of West Bengal and others, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3449; Biren Mandal v. State, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3455; Vinal Suresh Kamble vs. Chaluverapinake Apal S.P. & Anr., 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 28 (S.C.); State of Karnatka vs. M.V. Mahesh, 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 33 (SC); Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana, 2005 (1) RCR (Criminal) 317;
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Brij Bihari Son Of Ram Dayal And Bhoora ... on 8 July, 2005

Vs. State of Bihar, 1998 (2) Apex Court Journal 631 (SC); Bibhishan Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 348 (S.C.); Rameshwar Dass Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 349 (S.C.); Ram Rai Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 238 (Rajasthan); Chhajoo Vs. State, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 240 (Allahabad); Anmol Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 177; Santosh vs. State of Haryana, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 179; Dev Raj Vs. State of Haryana, 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 90 (P&H); State of U.P. Vs. Brij Bihari & Anr., 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 95 (Allahabad) (DB); Anath Bandhu Kundu vs. The State of West Bengal and others, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3449; Biren Mandal v. State, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3455; Vinal Suresh Kamble vs. Chaluverapinake Apal S.P. & Anr., 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 28 (S.C.); State of Karnatka vs. M.V. Mahesh, 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 33 (SC); Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana, 2005 (1) RCR (Criminal) 317;
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 14 - M Chaudhary - Full Document

Vimal Suresh Kamble vs Chaluverapinake Apal S.P. And Another on 8 January, 2003

Vs. State of Bihar, 1998 (2) Apex Court Journal 631 (SC); Bibhishan Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 348 (S.C.); Rameshwar Dass Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2008 (1) Criminal Court Cases 349 (S.C.); Ram Rai Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 238 (Rajasthan); Chhajoo Vs. State, 2002 (2) Criminal Court Cases 240 (Allahabad); Anmol Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 177; Santosh vs. State of Haryana, 2000 (1) RCR (Criminal) 179; Dev Raj Vs. State of Haryana, 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 90 (P&H); State of U.P. Vs. Brij Bihari & Anr., 2006 (2) Criminal Court Cases 95 (Allahabad) (DB); Anath Bandhu Kundu vs. The State of West Bengal and others, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3449; Biren Mandal v. State, 1996 Cr.L.J. 3455; Vinal Suresh Kamble vs. Chaluverapinake Apal S.P. & Anr., 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 28 (S.C.); State of Karnatka vs. M.V. Mahesh, 2003 (2) Apex Court Judgements 33 (SC); Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana, 2005 (1) RCR (Criminal) 317;
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 160 - B P Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 Next