Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.34 seconds)
Rajwati vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 14 February, 2023 cites

Prem Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Secretary on 2 September, 2019

"Issue a writ, order or direction in that nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay pension and other all retiral benefits to the petitioner by adding his services rendered as daily wages employee since 1.8.1989 to 31.7.2010 with his regular service for computation pension keeping in view of the judgment of apex court in the case of The State of Gujrat and others vs. Talsibhai Dhaijibhai Patel (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 1109 of 2022) and Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others 2019(10) SCC 516 as well as in the case of Bhanu Pratap Vs. State of U.P. and others (Writ-A No. 35301 of 2017 and Special Appeal No.97 of 2021 State of U.P. vs. Bhanu Pratap Sharma and Writ-A No. 19722 of 20198 Sita Devi vs. State of U.P. and others)"
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 898 - A Mishra - Full Document

Bhanu Pratap Singh Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. on 22 October, 2020

"Issue a writ, order or direction in that nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay pension and other all retiral benefits to the petitioner by adding his services rendered as daily wages employee since 1.8.1989 to 31.7.2010 with his regular service for computation pension keeping in view of the judgment of apex court in the case of The State of Gujrat and others vs. Talsibhai Dhaijibhai Patel (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 1109 of 2022) and Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others 2019(10) SCC 516 as well as in the case of Bhanu Pratap Vs. State of U.P. and others (Writ-A No. 35301 of 2017 and Special Appeal No.97 of 2021 State of U.P. vs. Bhanu Pratap Sharma and Writ-A No. 19722 of 20198 Sita Devi vs. State of U.P. and others)"
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Kumari Gita Devi (In Wria 2361 Of 2022) vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 14 July, 2022

"Issue a writ, order or direction in that nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay pension and other all retiral benefits to the petitioner by adding his services rendered as daily wages employee since 1.8.1989 to 31.7.2010 with his regular service for computation pension keeping in view of the judgment of apex court in the case of The State of Gujrat and others vs. Talsibhai Dhaijibhai Patel (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 1109 of 2022) and Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others 2019(10) SCC 516 as well as in the case of Bhanu Pratap Vs. State of U.P. and others (Writ-A No. 35301 of 2017 and Special Appeal No.97 of 2021 State of U.P. vs. Bhanu Pratap Sharma and Writ-A No. 19722 of 20198 Sita Devi vs. State of U.P. and others)"
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1