Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)Section 42 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 43 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 57 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The State Of Punjab vs Baldev Singh on 21 July, 1999
As has been highlighted in Baldev Singh's case (supra)
it has to be seen and gauzed whether the requirements of
Section 50 have been met. Section 50 in reality provides for
additional safeguards which are not specifically provided by
the statute. The stress is on the adoption of a reasonable,
fair and just procedure. No specific words are necessary to
be used to convey existence of the right.
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Balbir Singh on 1 March, 1994
In para 17 the conclusions in an earlier
judgment State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1994 (3) SCC 299
at para 25) were quoted and approved. We are concerned with
conclusions (2-C) and (3) which read as follows:
Prabha Shankar Dubey vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 December, 2003
The above position was elaborately dealt with in Prabha
Shankar Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2003 AIR SCW
6592).