Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)Section 4 in The Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Prahlad Singh & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 April, 2011
"Had original owners of Khasra No. 1636 or their legal
heirs or transferees received the compensation or had any
reference been made by them for enhancement of
compensation certainly as per dictum of Hon'ble Apex
Court in the case of Prahlad Singh (supra), this Court
would have arrived at the conclusion that possession of
acquired land of khasra No. 1636 was taken by the State
and present petitioners are unauthorized occupants.
However, since, landowners have not received
compensation and have not made any reference for
enhancement of the compensation, as agreed by learned
counsel for the parties, this Court in view of observations
made hereinabove, has no hesitation to hold that State
never took possession of any part of khasra No. 1636."
Section 7 in The Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
1