Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.64 seconds)Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 5 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
P. Anand Gajapathi Raju & Ors vs P.V.G. Raju (Died ) & Ors on 28 March, 2000
16. As observed by Supreme Court in P.Anand
Gajapathi Raju And Others vs. P.V.G. Raju (Dead) And
Others, (2000) 4 SCC 539, the language of Section 8 of
Arbitration & Conciliation Act is preemptory and, therefore,
it is obligatory for the Court to refer the parties to
arbitration in terms of their arbitration agreement and in
such a case, nothing remains to be decided in the original
action.
Section 8 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
M/S. Magma Leasing & Fin. Ltd. & Anr vs Potluri Madhavilata & Anr on 18 September, 2009
Similar view was taken by the Supreme Court in
Branch Manager, Magma Leasing and Finance Ltd. and
another v. Potluri Madhavilata and another, (2009) 10
SCC 103.
Article 34 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. & ... vs M/S. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd on 30 January, 2002
14. In Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. M/s
Pinkcity Midway Petroleums, AIR 2003 SC 2881 the
appellant before the Supreme Court filed an application
under Section 8 read with Section 5 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 in a civil suit filed by the respondent
seeking a decree of declaration. The learned Civil Judge
dismissed the application holding that the disputes between
the parties were not covered by the arbitration agreement.
The revision filed by the appellant against that order was
dismissed by the High Court. Setting aside the decision of
the High Court, the supreme Court referred to the decision
of its Constitutional Bench in Konkan Railway
CS(OS)No.2340/2008 Page 13 of 16
Corporation Ltd. v. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd., AIR
2002 SC 778 and held that if there is any objection as to
the applicability of the arbitration clause to the facts of the
case, the same will have to be raised before the concerned
arbitral tribunal and, therefore, the Courts below ought not
to have proceeded to examine the applicability of the
arbitration clause to the facts of the case in hand but ought
to have left that issue to be determined by that arbitral
tribunal.
1