Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.40 seconds)
Sh. Lalan Rai vs Sh. Sanjay Kumar on 15 October, 2018 cites

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Heeraman And Ors. 56 Mac/460/2012 ... on 13 February, 2018

27. As   already   mentioned   above,   there   is   sufficient   evidence   on record   to   establish   that   the   petitioner   had   suffered  grievous   injuries   i.e. compound Grade III Bimalleolar fracture right leg with raw area right foot with left frontal EDH due to the accident in question.  He has also sustained permanent disability of 51% in relation to his right lower limb, which is duly established   from   the   Disability   Certificate   (Ex.   PW2/1)   issued   by   SRHC Hospital,   Narela,   Delhi.   Thus,   he   would   not   be   able   to   enjoy   general amenities of life after the accident in question, during rest of his life and his quality of life has been definitely affected.  In view of the nature of injuries including permanent disability suffered by him and his continued treatment for considerable period, I award a notional sum of Rs. 1,50,000/­ towards loss of general amenities and enjoyment of life to the petitioner. (Reliance placed   on   ""IFFCO   Tokio   General   Insurance   Company   Limited   Vs. Arjun   &   Ors.",   MAC   APP.   No.   01/2013,   decided   on   04.01.2018   by Hon'ble Delhi High Court).
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 55 - P S Koshy - Full Document

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Rajni Yadav And Ors 4 Mac/1553/2015 ... on 3 October, 2018

33. The notional monthly income of petitioner has been taken as Rs. 6,656/­ per month as discussed above.  Thus, the loss of monthly future income would be Rs. 1,997/­ Rs. 6,656/­ x 30/100 ).  The total loss of future income would be Rs. 5,03,244/­ (Rs. 1,997/­ x 140/100 x 12 x 15).  Thus, a sum of Rs. 5,03,244/­ is awarded in favour of petitioner under this head. (Reliance placed on decisions of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in "National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hari Om Const. & Ors.", MAC APP No. 464/2011 decided on 03.11.17 and "ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Mahesh Kumar & Ors.", MAC APP No. 843/2011, decided on 03.11.17).
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 52 - Full Document

Master Sudeep vs Divisional Manager on 12 April, 2011

In the above cited decision, Hon'ble Apex Court while following the view taken in Master Mallikarjun(supra), calculated the compensation Lalan Rai & Monu Vs. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.   Page 25 of 33   MACP Nos. 5100/16 & 5099/16, FIR No. 41/12 DOD: 15.10.2018  award able to minor children who were rendered permanently disabled to the   extent  of   30%  and   20%  respectively,   added  Rs.  1,00,000/­   each   on account of pain and suffering in addition to the amount of compensation awarded, under non­pecuniary heads of agony to parents, transportation, special   diet,   nutrition   and   future   medical   expenses,   besides   the   actual expenditure under the heads of medical expenses and attendant.
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 400 - B S Gowda - Full Document

Kumari Kiran Thr. Her Father ... vs Sajjan Singh & Ors on 11 September, 2014

48. Now reverting back to the facts of the present case. As already noted above, minor child namely Monu has sustained permanent disability to the extent of 2% in relation to right lower limb. Thus, while following the decision rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in Kumari Kiran(supra), I hereby award compensation of Rs. 10,000/­ towards pain and suffering caused to the parents of injured.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 288 - V G Gowda - Full Document

Vinod Kumar @ Bittoo vs Roshni & Ors. on 5 July, 2012

25. Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter titled as " Vinod Kumar Bitoo   Vs.   Roshni   &   Ors."  passed   in   appeal   bearing  no.  MAC.APP 518/2010 decided on 05.07.12, has held as under:­ "   It   is   difficult   to   measure   the   pain   and   suffering   in terms   of   money   which   is   suffered   by   a   victim   on account  of serious injuries caused to him in a motor vehicle accident. Since the compensation is required to Lalan Rai & Monu Vs. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.   Page 14 of 33   MACP Nos. 5100/16 & 5099/16, FIR No. 41/12 DOD: 15.10.2018  be   paid   for   pain   and   suffering   an   attempt   must   be made to award compensation which may have some objective relation with the pain and suffering underwent by the victim. For this purpose, the Claims Tribunal and the Courts normally consider the nature of injury; the part   of   the   body   where   the   injuries   were   sustained, surgeries, if any, underwent by the victim, confinement in the hospital and the duration of treatment".
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 483 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sangeeta Devi & Ors on 22 February, 2016

55. In view of my findings on issues no. 1 & 2, I award a sum of Rs. 9,02,000/­   including   interim   award   amount   if   any)   in   MAC   Petition   No. 5100/16 and a sum of Rs.  1,68,000/­ (including interim award amount if any)   in  MAC   Petition   No.   5099/16,  alongwith   interest   @   9%   per   annum w.e.f. date of filing of petitions i.e. 31.07.14 in favour of petitioner(s) and against the respondents no. 1 & 2 jointly and severally. (Reliance placed on judgment  "Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sangeeta Devi & Ors bearing   MAC.   APP.   165/2011  decided   on  22.02.2016).    Issue   no.   3   is decided accordingly.
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 1285 - R K Gauba - Full Document
1   2 Next