Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.44 seconds)

Vimal Kanwar & Ors vs Kishore Dan & Ors on 3 May, 2013

14. Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of VIMAL KANWAR vs KISHORE DAN reported in (2013)7 SCC 476 held that amounts received by the legal heirs by way of provident fund, pension and insurance cannot be termed as 'pecuniary advantage' and same is not liable for deduction. It was also held by the Hon'ble Apex 16 Court that salary received on compassionate appointment cannot be deducted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 886 - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur And Ors. on 30 June, 2020

In the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs SATINDER KAUR @ SATWINDER KAUR @ OTHERS reported in 2020 SCC ONLINE SC 410, compensation to be awarded under other heads requires to be enhanced. Accordingly, award passed by the Tribunal stands modified. Thus, claimants are entitled to the compensation under the following heads:
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 1453 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

Number of persons dependent on the income of the deceased was his wife and two minor children, as per SARLA VERMA's case, 1/3rd will have to be deducted from out of the total gross income of the deceased towards his personal and living expenses and compensation has to be computed towards "loss of income to the dependents". Thus, compensation payable towards "loss of dependency" would be as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1