Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)

Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ld.Tr.Dir vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 15 May, 2009

The ld. court below had noted that mode of proof of RCA No. 96/2013 Hemwati Vs. The Delhi Administration & Ors. Page6/11 admissibility would be decided at the time of final arguments. However from the reading of the judgment, the same was not decided. The ld. court only held the the GPA is not a document of title. The ld. court below relying on the rulings of G. Ram Vs. DDA AIR 2003 Delhi 120, M.L. Aggarwal Vs. OBC, 128 (2008) DLT 407 and Suraj Lamp Industries Vs. State of Haryana AIR 2009 SC 3077 came to the conclusion that the GPA cannot be treated as a title.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 183 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

G. Ram vs Delhi Development Authority on 11 April, 2002

The ld. court below had noted that mode of proof of RCA No. 96/2013 Hemwati Vs. The Delhi Administration & Ors. Page6/11 admissibility would be decided at the time of final arguments. However from the reading of the judgment, the same was not decided. The ld. court only held the the GPA is not a document of title. The ld. court below relying on the rulings of G. Ram Vs. DDA AIR 2003 Delhi 120, M.L. Aggarwal Vs. OBC, 128 (2008) DLT 407 and Suraj Lamp Industries Vs. State of Haryana AIR 2009 SC 3077 came to the conclusion that the GPA cannot be treated as a title.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 205 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1