Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.27 seconds)

Bank Of India & Anr vs K.Mohandas & Ors on 27 March, 2009

Bank of India v. K. Mohandus, (2009) 5 SCC 313 : (2009) 2 SCC (Civ) 524 : (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 32 . Every contract is to be considered with reference to its object and the whole of its terms and accordingly the whole context must be considered in endeavouring to collect the intention of the parties, even though the immediate object of inquiry is the meaning of an isolated clause.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 203 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Provash Chandra Dalui & Anr vs Biswanath Banerjee & Anr on 3 April, 1989

35. The first issue that needs to be decided in the light of the terms and conditions of the General Body Resolutions and Lease Deed is about katkam 45/74 ::: Uploaded on - 03/11/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 24/02/2024 01:52:54 ::: k 46/74 wp_1057.20_group_SMC.doc nature of right created in favour of lessees, whether it is right of 'extension' or right of 'renewal'. The distinction between the two terms 'extension' and 'renewal' is discussed in the judgment of the Apex Court in Provash Chandra Dalui & Anr. (supra) wherein it is held in para 14 as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 197 - K N Saikia - Full Document

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Lalji Tandon (Dead) on 3 November, 2003

26. Mr. Damle would further contend that the Principal District Judge has erred in holding that a unilateral right of renewal was created in favour of the Lessees. That the judgment of the Apex Court in Lalji Tandon (supra) is distinguishable as there is no presumption in the present case of perpetual lease. That since the property in question is of public authority, private persons cannot be permitted to hold the same perpetually. He would therefore pray that the impugned judgment and order of the Principal District Judge be set aside and the eviction order dated 17 May 2018 be upheld.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 124 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1   2 3 Next