Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Incharge Officer And Anr vs Shankar Shetty on 31 August, 2010
Apart from the said
judgements, reference was also made to the judgements of the Apex Court in
Incharge Officer Vs Shankar Shetty (2010) 9 SCC 126 and BSNL Vs
Bhurumal, 2014(3) SCT 49 to rely upon the principle that re-instatement with
full back-wages is not automatic and the workman should be given monetary
compensation in the interest of justice.
Harjinder Singh vs Punjab State Warehousing Corp on 5 January, 2010
The Apex Court in Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 20-07-2024 11:36:56 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:081033-DB
LPA-1473-2024 (O&M) -3-
Development Corporation and another Vs Gitam Singh (2013) 5 SCC 136
had also examined the judgement in Harjinder Singh's case (supra) which is
being relied upon by learned counsel for the appellant and also another
judgement in Devinder Singh Vs Municipal Council, Sanaur, (2011) 6 SCC
584 by holding that it is not an absolute principle of law as such. The said
judgements were distinguished by the Apex Court itself and the relevant part
reads as under:-
Jagbir Singh vs Haryana State Agr.Marketing Board & Anr on 14 July, 2009
It is, however, a matter of record that the Apex
Court in Jagbir Singh Vs Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board
(2009) 15 SCC 327 had laid down the principle that a daily wager who had
worked intermittently about 25 years back was only entitled for compensation
and not re-instatement.
Asst.Engineer,Rajasthan Dev.Corp.& ... vs Gitam Singh on 31 January, 2013
The Apex Court in Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 20-07-2024 11:36:56 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:081033-DB
LPA-1473-2024 (O&M) -3-
Development Corporation and another Vs Gitam Singh (2013) 5 SCC 136
had also examined the judgement in Harjinder Singh's case (supra) which is
being relied upon by learned counsel for the appellant and also another
judgement in Devinder Singh Vs Municipal Council, Sanaur, (2011) 6 SCC
584 by holding that it is not an absolute principle of law as such. The said
judgements were distinguished by the Apex Court itself and the relevant part
reads as under:-
Devinder Singh vs Municipal Council,Sanaur on 11 April, 2011
The Apex Court in Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 20-07-2024 11:36:56 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:081033-DB
LPA-1473-2024 (O&M) -3-
Development Corporation and another Vs Gitam Singh (2013) 5 SCC 136
had also examined the judgement in Harjinder Singh's case (supra) which is
being relied upon by learned counsel for the appellant and also another
judgement in Devinder Singh Vs Municipal Council, Sanaur, (2011) 6 SCC
584 by holding that it is not an absolute principle of law as such. The said
judgements were distinguished by the Apex Court itself and the relevant part
reads as under:-