Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.34 seconds)
Lily Thomas vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 23 August, 1984 cites

Ahmed Moideen Khan And Ors. vs Inspector Of 'D' Division on 2 December, 1957

In Ahmed Moideen v. Inspector, D' Division, , a Bench of this Court, consisting of Panchapekesa Ayyar and Ganapatia Pillai JJ. opined that while considering whether a certain act of State Legislature is within its legislative powers, the Court can consider the items of Legislative Lists and the Bench repelled an argument put forth before it that the Legislature in modern times is expected to act with maximum wisdom and straight-forwardness and perspicacity and any enactment passed by it not satisfying these criteria must be held suspect The Bench pointed out that if an enactment is valid under the Constitution of India it will not become ultra vires, because the deal criteria urged by the learned counsel before the Bench are not satisfied.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Maharaj Umeg Slng And Others vs The State Of Bombay And Others on 6 April, 1955

In Maharaj Umeg Singh v. State of Bombay, the vires of the Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act 1953 (Bombay Act XXXIX of 1954) was challenged mainly relying on the agreements of merger entered into by the Rulers of the respective States with the Dominion of India on or about the 19th March 1948 and the collateral letters of guarantee passed by the Ministry of States in their favour on subsequent dates, the contents of which were regarded as part of the merger agreements entered into by them with the Dominion of India. Repelling the arguments I advanced in this behalf, the Supreme Court observed as follows: -
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 54 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next