Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.39 seconds)Section 3 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Sri. Girishchandra S/O Veerabhadrayya ... vs The State By Lokayuktha Police on 5 February, 2013
7. The allegations made against the petitioner and the
material collected against the petitioner do not show the
commission of any of the offences alleged against him in the FIR
and the proceedings initiated against the petitioner are contrary
to the decision in the case of GIRISHCHANDRA VS. STATE BY
LOKAYUKTHA POLICE reported in ILR 2013 Karnataka 983, and
the law laid down in the case of LALITHA KUMARI vs.
GOVERNMENT OF U.P. reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1. For both
these reasons, the proceedings are liable to be quashed.
Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013
7. The allegations made against the petitioner and the
material collected against the petitioner do not show the
commission of any of the offences alleged against him in the FIR
and the proceedings initiated against the petitioner are contrary
to the decision in the case of GIRISHCHANDRA VS. STATE BY
LOKAYUKTHA POLICE reported in ILR 2013 Karnataka 983, and
the law laid down in the case of LALITHA KUMARI vs.
GOVERNMENT OF U.P. reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1. For both
these reasons, the proceedings are liable to be quashed.