Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.45 seconds)

State Of Punjab vs Karnail Singh on 14 August, 2003

5.0 I have heard ld. Addl. P.P. Shri Salim Khan as well as Shri Sachin Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for both the accused persons. I have also carefully perused the material placed on record. 6.0 The Victim Priya PW2 has deposed that on 15.03.2012 at about 8:30 a.m, she was sitting at Birla Mandir Bus stand. At that time, two persons on a motorcycle came from behind and she sensed that something was wrong and tried to run. But, one of those persons snatched her gold chain and thereafter, the robbers escaped on their motorcycle towards PS Mandir Marg; she could not identify those two persons, who snatched her chain. She then immediately called her brother Shakti Singh from her mobile phone number 9968256125; her brother reached the bus stand within ten State Vs. Karnail Singh FIR No. 35/12 : PS Mandir Marg Page No. 4 of 30 -5- minutes. Her brother made a telephone call to the police from her mobile phone. The police had arrived and she narrated the incident to them and her statement Ex.PW2/A was recorded. PW2 also deposed that although, she could not notice the motorcycle number but, the people who had gathered there gave numerical digits of the motorcycle on which the accused persons had come. Numerical number of motorcycle i.e. 8351 is mentioned in Ex.PW2/A. However, in the said statement it is mentioned that PW2 had noted the number. But, in her cross- examination by Ld. Additional PP, PW2 denied that the number was noted by her. The fact that the motorcycle number was noted by people gathered at the spot, has remained uncontested. Same is also corroborated by PW2's brother PW5, as discussed in paras infra.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 570 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 Next