Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.63 seconds)The Payment Of Wages Act, 1936
A.R. Sarin vs B.C. Patil And Anr. on 20 April, 1951
6. On the contrary, it may be pointed out that in A. R. Sarin v. B. C. Patil, AIR 1951 Bom 423, it was held that the jurisdiction of the Payment of Wages Authority did not extend to determining the question as to whether the contract has terminated as alleged by the employer or the contract was still subsisting as alleged by the servant.
Viswanath Tukaram vs General Manager, Central Railway And ... on 4 July, 1957
Again in Vishwanath Tukaram v. General Manager, Central Rly., AIR 1958 Bom 111 (FB), it was held by a Full Bench of that Court that
"the Payment of Wages Authority had no jurisdiction to decide whether the services of an employee were rightly or wrongly terminated by the employer or whether his dismissal was lawful or unlawful."
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Codialabail Press vs Monappa (K.) on 12 April, 1962
The only case, which mav be taken to lend support to it is Union of India v. Baburam, AIR 1962 All 52, but the view expressed by the learned single Judge in that case has not been accepted in Manager, Codialabail Press's case, AIR 1963 Mys 128, referred to above, and we also feel that some of the observations made therein run counter to the views expressed by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in A. V. D.'
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
K.P. Mushran vs B.C. Patil And Anr. on 24 August, 1951
It is doubtful if Respondent No. 2 before us viz. Payment of Wages Authority had carefully gone into this case, because it does not support the view expressed by it. On the contrary, it was clearly pointed out by their Lordships that the Authority set up under Section 15 of the Statute is a tribunal of limited jurisdiction, and its power to hear and determine disputes is limited by the provisions of the Act. The said Authority has also referred to K. P. Mushran v. B. C. Patil, AIR 1952 Bom 235, Payment of Wages Inspector M. B. Govt. v. Bramhodatta Bagrodia, AIR 1956 Madh B. 152, and Jay Gujarat Prakashan Ltd. v. Hari Prasad Hargovindas Pandya, AIR 1960 Guj 10, but none of these cases lend support to the conclusion arrived at by the Authority.
1