Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.36 seconds)Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Rammi Alias Rameshwar vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 September, 1999
In still another case Rammi @ Rameshwar Vs. State of M.P.: AIR
1999 SC 3544 Hon'ble Apex Court held that no true witness can possibly
escape from making some discrepant details. Hon'ble court held that
probably an untrue witness who is properly tutored can make his testimony
non discrepant.
Ram Chander And Ors vs State Of Haryana on 12 May, 1983
43. I would like to refer to case decided by our own Delhi High Court titled
as Ram Chander Vs. State : 2009 Cri. L.J. 4058. His Lordship had held:
B. Noha vs State Of Kerala And Anr on 6 November, 2006
In B. Noha Vs. State of Kerala : 2006 (VI) AD Cri. 465,
Hon'ble Apex Court had held that when there was voluntary and conscious
acceptance of money, there was no further burden cast on the prosecution to
prove by direct evidence the demand or motive.
Laxmipat Choraria And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 14 December, 1967
Hon'ble Supreme Court had an occasion to deal with similar situation in
Laxmipat Choraria and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra: 1968 Cri. L.J.
1126 in that case smuggling racket was in operation which involved few
Indians and Chinese personnels. They used to smuggle gold by BOAC
flights. One Yau Mockchi approached one Sophia Yong of BOAC. She
informed police. A trap was laid and Yau Mockchi was caught with suit
case with gold in it. On search, visiting cards and photographs of several
persons including Ethyl Wong were found. Ethyl Wong was examined as a
witness in the case. The convicted accused persons challenged her
examination. They claimed that she could not be examined as a witness.
Hon'ble Supreme Court after examining the matter observed: