Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014

The DoP&T taking into consideration the decision in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih, (2015) 4 SCC 334, issued exhaustive guidelines vide OM dated 02.03.2016 on recovery of wrongful/excess payments made to Government servants. In the instant case, the applicant retired on 31.12.2022. He was communicated the office order showing the recovery on 23/24.01.2023. He submitted representation on 22.03.2023 and filed this OA on 03.06.2024. Respondents filed their counter on 29.05.2025 stating therein that they have not recovered any amount from the retiral dues of the applicant but withheld the same awaiting final decision of the competent authority without stating who is the competent authority to take a decision when counter has also been filed on behalf of Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi. Hence, this submission of the respondents is held to be an arbitrary action on their part. RAVI KUMAR 2026.01.21 15:56:17 +05'30'
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 7379 - J S Khehar - Full Document

B.H. Amar Venkatesh And Ors. vs Senior Superintendent Of Post Officers ... on 19 February, 2004

Therefore, according to the present applicant, the OA No. 542/2020 having been decided by the Single Bench without taking note of the decision in the case of B H AMAR Venkatesh & Ors (supra), facts noted above, and the law laid by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Jogeswar Sahoo (supra), the decision in OA No. 542/2020 has no application for allowing the present OA. Law of precedent requires that similar matter to be decided in similar line provided that the facts in both the cases are not distinguishable [Ref.
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1