Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.42 seconds)
Workmen Of The Straw Board ... vs M/S. Straw Board Manufacturing Company ... on 21 March, 1974
cites
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 4K in U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Factories Act, 1948
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Management Of Wenger & Co vs Their Workmen(And Vice Versa) on 11 December, 1962
Bearing in mind the not too rigid principles laid down by
this Court, as noticed above, we have to consider if the two
units, the S. Mill and the R. Mill can be held, on the
materials established in this case, to be functionally one
single establishment. Broadly the common features of the
two units emphasised before us by the appellants are unity
of ownership; ultimate control and supervision; unity oil
finance; similarity of service conditions in general,
similarity Of general. wage structure; proximity of the
units; some work (viz., preparation. of water proof Masala)
for the R. Mill being performed in the S. Mill; common
boiler located in the S. Mill supplying steam to R. Mill;
location of the processing furnace of the R. Mill ill tile
S. Mill; identical bonus scheme for both the units except
for one year; intertransferability of employees from one
unit to the other; identical working conditions; maintenance
of one balance sheet and profit and loss account and one
consolidated account for the company including both the
units; depreciation fund; same occupier, namely, the
Director
(1) [1963] Supp. 2 S. C. R. 862/871.
The Associated Cement Companies ... vs Their Workmen on 11 September, 1959
In India cO..Ltd. v. Its Workmen, (1) this Court while
approving of the principles laid down in Associated Cement
Companies case (supra) at page 419 entered a significant
observation as follows
"In Associated Cement Companies case (supra)
it was held that all the tests referred to in
the judgmente were satisfied and therefore the
question of the comparative weight to be
attached to the several tests did not arise
for consideration".
Section 25 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
1