Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.50 seconds)Section 4 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 447 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Indira Bai 4 Wpc/1549/2016 Prakash ... on 29 January, 2018
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to stay the proceeding of Criminal Case No. 1029/2021, State Vs. Vijay Shanker Shukla, arising out of Case Crime No. 0016/2021, under Section 2/3 Damages to Public Property Act, Police Station Amethi, District Amethi during the pendency of present petition before this Hon'ble Court."
Section 145 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
The Railways Act, 1989
Abdul Rashid vs State Of U.P. And Another on 9 August, 2021
(20). It was noted by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Abdul Rashid vs. State of U.P., 2010 SCC online Alld 2819, wherein it has been held that the judicial order cannot be allowed to be passed in a mechanical fashion either by filling in the blanks in a printed proforma or by affixing a readymade seal etc. of the order on a plain paper. Such tendency must be deprecated and cannot be allowed to perpetuate. This reflects not only lack of judicial mind to the facts of the case but is also against the settled judicial norms.
Bhushan Kumar & Anr vs State(Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 4 April, 2012
(21). Similarly in the case of Bhushan Kumar vs. State (NCT of Delhi), 2012 5 SCC 424, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that Section 204 of the Code does not mandate the Magistrate to explicitly state the reasons for issuance of summons. It clearly states that if in the opinion of a Magistrate taking cognizance of an offence, there is sufficient ground for proceeding, then the summons may be issued.