Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 42 (0.32 seconds)Section 2 in The Lokpal And Lokayuktas Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 167 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 8 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Lokpal And Lokayuktas Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 July, 1994
11. The above enunciation of the law that takes into consideration the decision of the Constitution Bench in Sanjay Dutt vs. State of Maharashtra, (1994) 5 SCC 410, as also the decision of their Lordships in Hitendra Vishnu Thakur vs. State of Maharashtra, (1994) 4 SCC 602 and, upon review of a wealth of authority relating to the issue of liberty, holds the right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. to be indefeasible subject, of course, to the right of the Investigating Agency, to re-arrest the accused on the basis of charges that appear against him, vindicated by the charge sheet filed.