Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.29 seconds)
P.Sangeetharaj vs The Managing Director on 2 August, 2022 cites

The Silppi Constructions Contractors vs Union Of India on 21 June, 2019

20. The essence of the law laid down in the judgments referred to above is the exercise of restraint and caution; the need for overwhelming public interest to justify judicial intervention in matters of contract involving the state instrumentalities; the courts should give way to the opinion of the experts unless the decision is totally arbitrary or unreasonable; the court does not sit like a court of appeal over the appropriate authority; the court must realise that the authority floating the tender is the best judge of its requirements and, therefore, the court’s interference should be minimal. The authority which floats the contract or tender, and has authored the tender documents is the best judge as to how the documents have to be interpreted. If two interpretations are possible then the interpretation of the author must be accepted. The courts will only interfere to prevent arbitrariness, irrationality, bias, mala fides or perversity. With this approach in mind we shall deal with the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 312 - D Gupta - Full Document

State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors vs Nandlal Jaiswal & Ors on 24 October, 1986

40. But, while considering the applicability of Article b, in such a case, we must bear in mind that, having regard to the nature of the trade or business, the Court would be slow to interfere with the policy laid down by the State Government for grant of licences for manufacture and sale of liquor. The Court would, in view of the inherently pernicious nature of the commodity allow a large measure of latitude to the State Government in determining its policy of regulating, manufacture and trade in liquor. Moreover, the grant of licences for manufacture and sale of liquor would essentially be a matter of economic policy where the court would hesitate to intervene and strike down what the State Government has done, unless it appears to be plainly arbitrary, irrational or mala fide.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 869 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 3 Next