Smt. Santosh Kumari vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 23 October, 2009
Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submit that without completion of internship, one is not eligible to practice thus there is no illegality in the action of the Commission. The petitioners are not eligible for selection as they have not completed internship on or prior to date of interview. The issue aforesaid has already been decided by this court in the case of Sanju Choudhary & ors versus State of Rajasthan & ors, reported in 2009 WLC (Rajasthan) 154. Therein, considering the same issue, it was held that those who have not completed internship are not eligible for appointment to the post of Ayurvedic Chikitsak. Since the controversy has already been settled by this court in the aforesaid case, all the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed.