Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)

Ajmer Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 February, 2010

22. The next contention raised by Ld counsel has been that no public witness was joined and the testimony of police officials is not to be relied upon as they are always interested in success of the prosecution case. On consideration of testimony of the witnesses as well as documentary evidence, I find no reason to discard their evidence. It is consistently stated by all members of the raiding party that efforts were made by the IO to join public witnesses but no one came forward. There is no suggestion to the prosecution witnesses that no such S.C.No. 67/06 Page 14 of 17 pages 15 efforts were made. Otherwise also, it is not uncommon that public persons are reluctant to join police proceedings as they do not want to get involved in hectic police and court proceedings. Merely for the reason that no public person joined the raid, the officials cannot be disbelieved. It has also been held by Supreme Court in Ajmer Singh Vs State of Haryana, 2010 (2) RCR, Crl. 132 that non joining of independent witness is not fatal to the prosecution case particularly when efforts were made by the investigating party to join public witness but none was willing. It was held that accused cannot be acquitted only because no independent witness was produced. The conviction was upheld in this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 657 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1