Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.05 seconds)
Pawan Thakur vs State Of H.P. And Others on 19 December, 2019 cites

Sheonandan Paswan vs State Of Bihar & Others on 16 December, 1982

under Section 321 of the Cr. P.C., before the learned Court concerned. Further onwards, in a judgment reported, in, (1987) 1 Supreme Court Cases, 288, and, rendered in case titled as, "Sheonandan Pawan versus State of Bihar and others", also alike, the afore expostulation of law, occurring, in, the afore judgment (supra), as, rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court, has therethrough settled, the trite test(s), for, validating, any prosecutrial application, cast under Section 321 of Cr. P.C., before the learned Court concerned, (a) tests whereof enjoins qua the apposite application becoming filed, hence by the Public Prosecutor, who is, competent, to, make, an, application, for withdrawal, b) his being In-charge, of, the case, (c) the application requiring, the, consent of the Court, wherebefore the Charge, is, 7 ::: Downloaded on - 21/12/2019 20:26:00 :::HCHP 8 pending. It, also, becomes enshrined therein, that in case, the afore parameters, become, satiated, .
Supreme Court of India Cites 51 - Cited by 227 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document

Rajinder Kumar Jain vs The State Of Punjab on 8 May, 2019

5. Even, in, the judgment rendered, by the Hon'ble Apex Court, reported in (1980) 3 Supreme Court Cases, 435, rendered in case titled as, "Rajinder Kumar Jain versus State through Special Police Establishment and others", it, becomes propounded therein, (a) that, the ultimate discretion, for moving an application, under Section 321 of Cr. P.C. before the Court concerned, becoming completely vested, in the Public Prosecutor concerned, (b) besides, it has also become propounded therein, that, the jurisdiction, of, the Court, being supervisory, and being limited, foronly discerning, from, the grounds, as, cast in the 8 ::: Downloaded on - 21/12/2019 20:26:00 :::HCHP 9 application, as, also, from the connected therewith records, vis-à-vis, hence the Public Prosecutor .
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1