Assistant G.M. State Bank Of India & Ors vs Radhey Shyam Pandey on 26 February, 2015
29. All incriminating evidence was put to the accused persons
when there were examined u/s 313 Cr.P.C. They denied the evidence
against them as false. Accused Vipin took the plea that he was not
SC No. 1702/16 State Vs Radhey Shyam & Ors. Page No. 12 of 27
present at the time of incident. Accused Radhey Shyam Pahadia
denied the incident as a whole and stated that it was a false case at the
instance of the complainant who is having a property dispute with
him. Accused Maan Singh also denied entire incident. With regard to
the injury on the finger of Neeraj he stated that the finger of Neeraj
had come between the door and therefore, he suffered injury. He has
stated that the dispute is with regard to the property and the documents
of the property, which was owned by his father, are in possession of
Shiv Charan Pahadia, his brother. He stated that his brother was
pressurizing their mother to give properties to him by way of transfer.
Accused Keshraj took plea that he was not present at the time of
incident and he was at his native place Hindon City, Rajasthan at the
time of alleged incident. Smt. Santosh took the plea that the entire
incident is false. Accused Sanjay also denied the incident and stated
that he had been falsely implicated in this case. He stated he was
working on the shop of Man Singh and that he had come to the
residence of the accused at around 10 AM for taking key of the shop
but there he was apprehended by the police at the instance of the
complainant. Accused Rajni also denied the incident as false.