Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (2.43 seconds)

Bimlesh Tanwar vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 10 March, 2003

15. As already discussed hereinabove, the Division Bench in the first judgment has clearly held that the cases before it were not individualistic in nature to be decided on the basis of facts arising in each case. The cases arose only on one principle i.e. as 11 to whether seniority should be as per the merit reckoned by the TNPSC or as per roster point. The Division Bench clearly held that the seniority should be on the basis of the merit reckoned by the TNPSC and not as per the roster point. This Court while dismissing the Special Leave Petition affirmed the view of the High Court holding that after the judgment of this Court was pronounced in Bimlesh Tanwar (supra), the principle governing the determination of seniority was only on the basis of merit list of selection and not as per the basis of roster point.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 160 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1