Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax- ... vs First Advantage Private Limited, ... on 16 August, 2024
cites
Section 194C in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 250 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 115JB in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Addl. Cit, Special Range- 1, New Delhi vs Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., New ... on 8 May, 2023
In keeping with the tests as laid down by the Special Bench of the ITAT, in
the case of CIT vs. Amway India Enterprises, 111 ITD 112[SB] (Delhi), three
tests have to be met in order to pass the expenditure incurred on account of
software expenses as capital, or otherwise. These are the ownership test, the
enduring benefit test and the functionality test. In the present case, as rightly
considered by the ld. CIT(A), none of these tests fails the claim of the assessee.
The software was not owned by the assessee. The assessee acquired the
license only to use the same. The license fee was not paid for obtaining any
right qua the transfer of the software. Then, obsolescence also does not prove
any enduring benefit to the assessee. It is not the case of the Department that
the longevity of the software is any more than two years. Rather, it has not
been disputed that all but one of the items of expenditure have a life much less
than two years. Apropos the functionality test, the Department again does not
refute the fact that the software license was acquired by the assessee to carry
out its routine operations in a more efficient manner. Further, the fixed capital
of the assessee has not been shown to have undergone any change as a
consequence of the acquisition of the license. In fact, it was either an antivirus
software, or a software for filing TDS return or payments for support service for
maintenance of firewalls, maintenance charges of Microsoft licenses, annual
hosting fees, etc. Therefore, the nature of the software acquired is that of a
revenue expense, the ld. CIT(A) has rightly held it to be so.
1