Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.29 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
M.P. Housing Board & Anr vs Manoj Shrivastava on 24 February, 2006
In M. P. Housing Board &
Anr. v. Manoj Shrivastava, (2006) 2 SCC 702, this
Court stated the law in the following wards:-
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 February, 2005
Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 2005 SC 633. where the Hon'ble
Supreme Court observed that it is not always mandatory to order
reinstatement after holding the termination illegal, and instead compensation
can be granted.
North East Karnataka Road Transport ... vs M.Nagangouda on 9 January, 2007
In North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation v. M.
Nagangouda, 2007 LLR 340, it was held that gainful employment of a
workman during interregnum will also include either self-employment or
earning some amount from agricultural pursuits to maintain himself.
Municipal Council, Sujanpur vs Surinder Kumar on 5 May, 2006
In Municipal Council, Sujanpur vs. Surinder Kumar -2006-LLR-662 it
was held that:
M.V. Bijlani vs Union Of India & Ors on 5 April, 2006
'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the
Constitution of India, the Appellant for the purpose of
recruiting its employees was bound to follow the
recruitment rules. Any recruitment made in violation of
such rules as also in violation of the constitutional
scheme enshrined under Articles 14 and 16 of the
Constitution of India would be void in law. [See M.V.
Bijlani v. Union of India & Ors., (2006) 4 SCALE 147:
State Of Punjab vs Jagdip Singh & Ors on 19 September, 1963
State of Punjab v. Jagdip Singh & Ors., 1964 (4) SCR
964 and Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi,
2006(4) SCAE 197].