Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)
Seth Manak Chand vs Nemi Chand on 8 September, 2022 cites

Jamnalal & Ors vs Radheshyam on 18 April, 2000

(a) of the Act. The ratio of the case of Jamnalal Vs. Radheshyam (2000)4SCC380 =2000(2)MPLJ385 (supra) is altogether different and is not applicable to the present case. Accordingly, it is held that the plaintiff is not entitled to decree of eviction on the ground under section 12(1)(a) of the Act, because no foundation is there in the plaint for seeking decree of eviction on the ground of arrears of rent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 43 - S S Quadri - Full Document

Santosh Hazari vs Purushottam Tiwari (Dead) By Lrs on 8 February, 2001

21. Upon making comparative study of the judgement and decree passed by learned trial Court and by learned first appellate Court, it is clear that learned first appellate Court has not followed the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Santosh Hazari (2001)3SCC179 (supra) and even without reversing the findings and reasoning recorded by learned trial Court, learned first appellate Court has reversed the judgement and decree of trial Court, which has vitiated the impugned judgement and decree passed by learned first appellate Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1602 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Sayeda Akhtar vs Abdul Ahad on 18 July, 2003

In the case of Sayeda Akhtar Vs. Abdul Ahad (2003)7SCC52 Supreme Court has in para 4 held that "A bare perusal of the aforementioned provision would clearly go to show that although the court has the jurisdiction to extend the time for depositing the rent both for the period during which the tenant had defaulted as well as the period subsequent thereto but therefor an application is to be made. The provision requiring an application to be made is indisputably necessary for the purpose of showing sufficient cause as to why such deposit could not be made within the time granted by the Court. The court does not extend time or condone the delay on mere sympathy. It will exercise its discretion judicially and on a finding of existence As such it is held that learned first appellate Court has of sufficient cause."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 79 - Full Document
1