Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.63 seconds)
M/S. L???Oreal vs Mr. Dushyant Shah on 28 September, 2011 cites

Shree Rajmoti Industries vs Rajmoti Oil Mill Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. on 2 November, 2004

In Shree Rajmoti Industries vs. Rajmoti Oil Mill CS(OS)No.600/2007 Page 7 of 20 Pvt. Ltd & Anr. 2005 (30) PTC 38 (Del), the plaintiff had averred in the plaint that it was carrying on business in Delhi and for this purpose it had referred to two of its distributors. This was held to be a sufficient compliance under Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act and Section 134(2) of the Trademarks Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 11 - M Mudgal - Full Document

Mars Incorporated vs Kumar Krishna Mukerjee And Ors. on 30 October, 2002

In Mars Incorporated vs. Kumar Krishna Mukerjee & Ors. 2003 (26) PTC 60 (Del), the defendant sought to incorporate a company named MARS FOODS PVT LTD, though mark was the registered trademark of the CS(OS)No.600/2007 Page 14 of 20 plaintiff company. The question which came up for consideration before this Court was as to whether a person who has not suffered any damage in respect of trade either due to competition or due to deceptive or confusing similarities of the trademark adopted by the defendant has any right to challenge the act of the defendant in seeking to incorporate a company under a name which included the name of the registered trademark of the plaintiff company. The defendant in that case had been incorporated as a company but had not commenced operations by manufacture of sale of goods. Upholding the right of the plaintiff to maintain cause of action on account of apprehension of infringement of its trademark, this Court inter alia observed as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 22 - J D Kapoor - Full Document
1