Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)

B.S. Bajwa & Anr vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 11 December, 1997

13. Although the learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioners placed reliance on the Judgment of the Supreme Court in B.S. Bajwa v. State of Punjab, and the Judgment of this Court in V. Rajamallaiah v. High Court of A.P., (DB), to contend that in the matter of seniority, settled matters should not be unsettled after a lapse of considerable time, we do not think that the principle laid down in the above two decisions would apply to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 249 - Full Document

V. Rajamallaiah vs High Court Of A.P. And Another on 12 April, 2001

13. Although the learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioners placed reliance on the Judgment of the Supreme Court in B.S. Bajwa v. State of Punjab, and the Judgment of this Court in V. Rajamallaiah v. High Court of A.P., (DB), to contend that in the matter of seniority, settled matters should not be unsettled after a lapse of considerable time, we do not think that the principle laid down in the above two decisions would apply to the facts of the present case.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 7 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

K.A. Natesa Chettiar vs Nune Krishniah Chetty And Anr. on 30 January, 1970

"In view of the above, and taking into consideration of the totality of the case, the Review petition filed by Sri K.G. v. Krishniah is allowed, and Government accordingly, direct that the Seniority of Sri K.G.V. Krishniah be fixed notionally in the cadre of Upper Division Clerks and Superintendents over and above to Sri S. Venkata Reddy of Srisailam Devasthanam.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 6 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1