Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.59 seconds)
St. vs . Vijay Kumar Sharma & Others. on 27 June, 2014 cites

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Choudhary Vijay Kumar Sharma on 28 June, 2013

20. It be also observed that accused through Ex DW1/A­E has been able to explain as to how recovery proceedings of dowry articles were not as per rules and some of the articles did not belong to complainant but police seized all at FIR no. 117/00 PS Roop Nagar. State Vs. Vijay Kumar Sharma and Others 25 the instance of complainant. The said complaints were made on the same day and therefore it can not be stated to have been filed to create evidence against the complainant. During cross examination DW1 has stated that he did not go to higher authority when police did not take action but this admission does not negate the fact that no complaint was filed against the complainant. During cross­examination he has denied that these are false and fabricated documents and had been filed after due deliberation at the instance of accused V.K.Sharma to create false evidence. He has denied that articles do not belong to them hence they never filed any applications to get the same released from Maalkhana as he had knowledge that said articles do not belong to them.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - N Sinha - Full Document

Smt. Neera Singh vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) And Ors. on 23 February, 2007

In such circumstances being guided by the judgment of Neera Singh vs. State Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. 138 (2007) DLI 152. The court is of the view that gift articles are given at the time of marriage to the couple for their personal and joint use being customary in nature and therefore the same cannot be said to be given exclusively to the husband and his family members only. It be also observed that no evidence has been collected with regard to giving of dowry or resources of complainant's family claiming spending of huge amount.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 156 - S N Dhingra - Full Document

Narender Kumar And Anr. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) [Along With ... on 1 November, 2007

( Narender Kumar Vs State(Govt. Of NCT of Delhi )supra) (23.4) No evidence has come on record to show that dowry articles were misappropriated by accused persons with dishonest intention or they used it for their own use or disposed off the same. It is observed that some of the articles, which were seized during investigation at the instance of FIR no. 117/00 PS Roop Nagar.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 42 - S N Dhingra - Full Document
1   2 3 Next