Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.22 seconds)Section 91 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
I.R. Hingorani vs Pravinchandra Kantilal Shah And Ors. on 4 May, 1972
The Division Bench in I.R. Hingorani's case relied on the Full Bench judgment in Farkhundali v. Potdar.
Section 2 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Shyam Co-Operative Housing Society ... vs Ramibai Bhagwansing Advani And Ors. on 3 March, 1952
Section 54(1) was suitably amended in the light of the observations made in Shyam Co-op. Housing Society's case (supra) so as to bring within the sweep of Section 54 any debt due to the society from the member whether incurred in the capacity of such member or not.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 54 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Manohar Ramchandra Sarfare vs The Konkan Co-Operative Housing ... on 18 August, 1961
The conception of the flat having been sold to respondent No. 1 (i.e. the member of the society) or he having become the owner or tenant thereof or society becoming ever a landlord militate not only against other recitals in the judgment but also against the true position of any member in relation to his flat in a housing society as conceived under Section 2(16) of the Act read with Section 12, Rule 10 and the true import of the bye-laws as interpreted by the Full Bench of this Court in Konhan Co-op. Housing Society's case (supra). The observations however can be reconciled with unduly widely worded bye-laws which invariably contain innumerable clauses pregnant with enabling provisions to meet all conceivable contingencies but mostly unrelated to the main object of the society. A Society can be conceived to be landlord only in the event of its leasing the member's flat due to unavoidable temporary inability of any member to occupy the flat. We are, however', not satisfied that last few lines in para. 9 of the judgment are irreconcilable on any hypothesis whatsoever. At any rate, these cannot have the effect of eroding the clear ratio of the judgment.
Malvan Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd. vs Kamalakar Narayan Zantye And Ors. on 10 February, 1954
Malvan Co-op. Bank v. Kamalakar only takes notice of this change in the statute.