Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.43 seconds)Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Syed Yakoob vs K.S. Radhakrishnan & Others on 7 October, 1963
In the second judgment - Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab
(supra), this Court reiterated the limitations of certiorari jurisdiction
indicated in Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan (supra) and observed:
State Bank Of India vs Shri N. Sundara Money on 16 January, 1976
20. This Court has repeatedly held that the provisions contained in
Section 25F (a) and (b) are mandatory and termination of the service of a
workman, which amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Section
2(oo) without giving one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof and
retrenchment compensation is null and void/illegal/inoperative--State of
Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha AIR 1960 SC 610, Bombay
Union of Journalists v. State of Bombay AIR 1964 SC 1617, State
Bank of India v. N. Sundara Money (supra), Santosh Gupta v. State
Bank of Patiala (1980) 3 SCC 340, Mohan Lal v. Bharat Electronics
Ltd.(1981) 3 SCC 225, L. Robert D'Souza v. Southern Railway
(supra), Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (1980) 4 SCC 443, Gammon India Ltd.
Section 17B in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003
In Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai (supra), the two-Judge
Bench noticed the distinction between the scope of Articles 226 and 227
of the Constitution and culled out several propositions including the
following:
Surendra Kumar Verma Etc vs The Central Government Industrial ... on 23 September, 1980
20. This Court has repeatedly held that the provisions contained in
Section 25F (a) and (b) are mandatory and termination of the service of a
workman, which amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Section
2(oo) without giving one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof and
retrenchment compensation is null and void/illegal/inoperative--State of
Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha AIR 1960 SC 610, Bombay
Union of Journalists v. State of Bombay AIR 1964 SC 1617, State
Bank of India v. N. Sundara Money (supra), Santosh Gupta v. State
Bank of Patiala (1980) 3 SCC 340, Mohan Lal v. Bharat Electronics
Ltd.(1981) 3 SCC 225, L. Robert D'Souza v. Southern Railway
(supra), Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (1980) 4 SCC 443, Gammon India Ltd.