Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)
Food Corporation Of India vs Vinod Kumnar Singh on 12 August, 2024 cites

Capt.M. Paul Anthony vs Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. & Anr on 30 March, 1999

M. Paul Anthony (supra), Stanzen Toyotetsu India Private Limited (supra) and by the coordinate Bench in the matter of Harish Prakash Hinunia (supra), in the opinion of this Court, Signature Not Verified Signed by: MOHD IRFAN SIDDIQUI Signing time: 17-08-2024 11:17:23 5 WA-1752-2023 learned writ court has not committed any error or infirmity in restraining the employer from proceedings with the charge-sheet in the departmental enquiry for a period of 12 months from the date of order as both the cases are on the basis of commonality of charges, proposed witnesses and proposed documents and factual and legal complexity involved in both the trial are also same. The impugned order passed by learned writ court does not require any interference.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 1683 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

M/S Stanzen Toyotetsu India P.Ltd vs Girish V & Ors on 21 January, 2014

M. Paul Anthony (supra), Stanzen Toyotetsu India Private Limited (supra) and by the coordinate Bench in the matter of Harish Prakash Hinunia (supra), in the opinion of this Court, Signature Not Verified Signed by: MOHD IRFAN SIDDIQUI Signing time: 17-08-2024 11:17:23 5 WA-1752-2023 learned writ court has not committed any error or infirmity in restraining the employer from proceedings with the charge-sheet in the departmental enquiry for a period of 12 months from the date of order as both the cases are on the basis of commonality of charges, proposed witnesses and proposed documents and factual and legal complexity involved in both the trial are also same. The impugned order passed by learned writ court does not require any interference.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 289 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Food Corporation Of India vs Harish Prakash Hinunia on 8 March, 2022

M. Paul Anthony (supra), Stanzen Toyotetsu India Private Limited (supra) and by the coordinate Bench in the matter of Harish Prakash Hinunia (supra), in the opinion of this Court, Signature Not Verified Signed by: MOHD IRFAN SIDDIQUI Signing time: 17-08-2024 11:17:23 5 WA-1752-2023 learned writ court has not committed any error or infirmity in restraining the employer from proceedings with the charge-sheet in the departmental enquiry for a period of 12 months from the date of order as both the cases are on the basis of commonality of charges, proposed witnesses and proposed documents and factual and legal complexity involved in both the trial are also same. The impugned order passed by learned writ court does not require any interference.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - S Nagu - Full Document
1