Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)
Shri. Dadarao Dashrath Salve And Anr vs Union Of India, Through General Manager on 18 August, 2021 cites

Union Of India vs Rina Devi on 9 May, 2018

3] Tribunal negated the claim by a cryptic order without being sensitive to the very scheme of Section 124A of the Railways Act and also the fact of discharge of burden by the appellant by placing on record as contemplated in the Judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Union of India Vs. Rina Devi [2018 ACJ 1441] and Judgment delivered by this Court in the matter of Rekha Dilip Sapkale Vs. Union of India [2021(3) ABR 327]. These judgments can be eventually relied on so as to infer that claimant has established their case for grant of compensation particularly on the basis of following piece of evidence;
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 530 - A K Goel - Full Document

Smt.Rekha Dilip Sapkale vs Union Of India Thr. General Manager on 23 March, 2021

3] Tribunal negated the claim by a cryptic order without being sensitive to the very scheme of Section 124A of the Railways Act and also the fact of discharge of burden by the appellant by placing on record as contemplated in the Judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Union of India Vs. Rina Devi [2018 ACJ 1441] and Judgment delivered by this Court in the matter of Rekha Dilip Sapkale Vs. Union of India [2021(3) ABR 327]. These judgments can be eventually relied on so as to infer that claimant has established their case for grant of compensation particularly on the basis of following piece of evidence;
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - P K Chavan - Full Document
1