Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.26 seconds)Section 489C in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
M. Mammutti vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 1979
On the facts
of this case the presumption drawn by the trial court is not
warranted under Section 4 of the Evidence Act. Further it is also not
shown that any specific question with regard to the currency notes
being fake or counterfeit was put to the appellant in his
examination under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. On
these facts, we have no option but to hold that the charges framed
under Sections 489-B and 489-C are not proved. We, therefore, set
aside the conviction and sentence passed on the appellant under
Sections 489-B and 489-C IPC and acquit him of the said charges
(see: M. Mammutti v. State of Karnataka [(1979) 4 SCC 723 : 1980
SCC (Cri) 170 : AIR 1979 SC 1705] )."
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Umashanker vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 October, 2001
(ii) Umashanker Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, reported in (2001) 9
SCC 642 at Para 8.