Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.95 seconds)Section 9 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The Electricity Act, 2003
Ntpc Limited vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 12 May, 2015
This Tribunal in its earlier judgment dated 08.05.2014 in Appeal No.
173/2013 (NTPC Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
& Ors.) and judgment dated 01.05.2015 in Appeal No. 97/2013
(NTPC Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.)
disallowed capitalization of spare/additional transformers. In judgment
dated 01.05.2015, this Tribunal observed that unless there is a
specific provision in the Regulations permitting capitalization of the
cost of spare assets, such assets cannot be included in the capital
base.
M/S. Maharashtra State Power ... vs Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... on 18 January, 2013
In support of this
argument, the Learned Counsel for the Central
Commission quoted this Tribunal judgment dated
27.04.20111 in Appeal No. 72/2010 (Maharashtra State
Power Generation Corporation Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra
Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.) while
considering principle for prudence check of time overrun,
Page 35 of 47
Appeal No. 98 of 2015
which laid down the following guidelines for condoning the
delay:
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 61 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 111 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 178 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
1