Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.42 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 51 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Prem Jeevan vs K.S. Venkata Raman on 17 January, 2017
26. The learned Senior counsel relied upon the judgement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of [Prem Jeevan Vs. K.S.Venkata
Raman and another] reported in 2017 11 SCC 57, wherein the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has on the interpretation of Section 28 held as follows.
K. Karuppuraj vs M. Ganesan on 4 October, 2021
29. The learned Senior counsel further relied upon the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in [K.Karuppuraj Vs. M.Ganesan] reported in
2021 10 SCC 777 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the case
where the defendant was required to evict the tenant and hand over physical
possession at the time of execution of sale agreement on payment of sale
consideration. Since the plaintiff insisted the defendant to evict the tenants
even before the payment of sale consideration, the Hon'ble Supreme court
held that the plaintiff in that case was not ready and willing to perform his
contract. The said judgement is not applicable to the facts of the case as the
plaintiff never insisted the defendant to vacate the tenants before paying
balance eventhough the defendant agreed to vacate teneants before the time
specified.
Section 16 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Narasimhan vs Balammal on 12 September, 1988
28. The learned Senior Counsel also relied upon a judgement of
learned single judge of this Court in the case [Narasimhan Vs. Balammal]
reported in 1988 (2) MLJ 95 wherein the revision petition filed by the legal
representatives of defendant, as against the dismissal of application under
Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, to rescind the contract was allowed.
Section 29 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Sirmul vs Smt. Annapurna Devi on 23 February, 2000
The learned counsel Senior relied upon yet another judgment of a
Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of [Sirmul Vs.
Smt.Annapurna Devi Ravikumar Awasthy[ reported in 2001 (2) MPLJ
339, wherein it is observed as follows :-
1