Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)

Frick India Ltd vs Union Of India And Others on 21 December, 1989

In the light of above analysis and applying the ratio decidendi in the case of M/S Frick India (Supra), this Court, is of the view that the headnote cannot modify/alter the plain meaning of a statutory provision when the statute is clear and unambiguous. In the present case, Section 37 of the Act has to be construed taking into account the whole contents enumerated in the body of this provision and taking note of the objects the legislatures intended to achieve, which, if can be read in its proper perspective, then, all offences having punishment prescribed for less than 3(three) years and a case of small quantity, the same would be cognizable and bailable, since the said offences are covered by the category of third entry of part-II of the Schedule of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 59 - K Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next