Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.29 seconds)State Of U.P vs Shambhu Nath Singh And Ors on 29 March, 2001
In State of UP vs. Shambhu Nath singh [JT 2001 (4) SC
319] this Court has deprecated the practice of Courts
adjourning cases without examination of witnesses when such
witnesses are in attendance. We reminded the Courts thus:
Bar Council Of Maharashtra vs M. V. Dabholkar Etc. Etc on 3 October, 1975
In Bar Council of Maharashtra vs. MV Dabholkar [1976
(2) SCR 48] a four Judge Bench of this Court had held that
the requirement of reason to believe cannot be converted
into a formalised procedural road block, it being
essentially a barrier against frivolous enquiries.
Section 36 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Advocates Act, 1961
1