Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)Section 54C in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Niamat Mahroof Virji, Mumbai vs Ito 17(3)(3), Mumbai on 19 December, 2016
1. Niamat Mahroof Virji vs. ITO (2017)77 Taxmann.com 174
(Mumbai - ITAT ) - Bonds to be treated as 6 calendar months
Sunil Sahni vs Income-Tax Officer on 30 October, 1998
3. Sunil Kumar Saha vs. ITO (2015) 64 Taxmann.com 109
(Kolkata - ITAT ) - Bonds not available when assessee wanted to
invest - period to be extended
K.Parthasarathy vs The Income Tax Officer on 1 June, 2015
4. K Parthasarthy vs. ITO (2014) 49 Taxmann. Com 50
(Chennai- ITAT) - Delay can be extended in case of doctrine of
supervening impossibility
2.3 On the other hand, the ld. DR relied on the orders of the authorities
below.
1