Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.35 seconds)Section 13 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 14 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 42 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
A.P. Bagchi vs Mrs. F. Morgan on 17 September, 1936
In -- 'Vellaveeran
Chetty v. V. Veeran Chetty', AIR 1938 Mad
727 at p. 729 (D), it has been held that it is
perfectly competent to a court without
directing an enquiry to pass a decree
finally determining the amount of profits
payable subsequent to the institution of
the suit, if it is made out that it is not
necessary to make such an enquiry and
that it cannot be said that such a decree is not
final or is incapable of execution nor would it
be in contravention of the provisions of O. 20,
R. 12, Civil P.C. A preliminary decree becomes
necessary where the exact amount is to be
ascertained after the examination of fresh
evidence; see -- 'Bagchi, A.P. v. Mrs. F.
Morgan', AIR 1937 All 36 (E).
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Smt. G. Kusuma Devi vs Smt. Gowramma And Ors. on 1 August, 2006
In this regard, reference may be made to the law
laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the
case of G. Kusuma Devi v. Gowramma, 2006 SCC
OnLine Kar 456 : AIR 2006 Kar 295 : (2006) 6 Kant
31
CT 1390_Com.OS.1043-2022_Judgment.doc
KABC170019562022
LJ 120 : (2006) 5 AIR Kant R 478 : (2007) 2 ICC 516 :