Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.62 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs Union Of India & Ors on 7 March, 2011
However, as far as the sentence imposed upon
the appellant under section 309 of IPC is concerned, we would like to refer
to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Aruna Ramachandra
Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011) 4 SCC 524. In the said decision, it is
observed as under :-
Gangula Mohan Reddy vs State Of A.P on 5 January, 2010
In a recent decision of the Supreme
Court in the case of Gangula Mohan Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
(2010) 1 SCC 750, the Supreme Court upheld conviction of the accused
under Section 309 of IPC.
P.Rathinam vs Union Of India on 26 April, 1994
12. This leaves us with the conviction of the appellant under section 309
IPC. As far as section 309 is concerned, it is to be noted that the Supreme
Court in the decision in the case of P. Rathinam v. Union of India and
Anr reported in (1994) 3 SCC 394 laid down that Section 309 of IPC
violates Art.21 of the Constitution of India and so it is void.
1