Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
Sh. Lakkhan Chakma And 15 Ors vs State Of Mizoram And 4 Ors on 19 November, 2025 cites

Pu Myllai Hlychho & Ors vs State Of Mizoram & Ors on 11 January, 2005

This court is also of the considered opinion that the case in Pu Myllai Hlychho Vs. State of Mizoram, (supra) is not aptly applicable in the instant case since the Governor is empowered to exercise his functions in his discretion under Paragraph 16(2) and 20BB of the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, after due consultation of the Council of Ministers. It may also noted that at sub para 3 of paragraph 16 provides for the condition under which an order made under sub paragraph 2 of paragraph 16 can cease to operate.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 33 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document

Chandra Kishore Jha vs Mahavir Prasad & Ors on 21 September, 1999

12. The learned counsel has relied on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chandra Kishore Jha Vs. Mahavir Prasad & Ors., reported in (1999) 8 SCC 266 (para 17) and OPTO Circuits (India) Ltd. Vs. Axis Bank, (2021) 6 SCC 707 wherein, it was held that it is a well-settled salutary Page No.# 9/18 2025:GAU-MZ:291 principle that if a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other manner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 234 - Full Document

Opto Circuit India Ltd. vs Axis Bank on 3 February, 2021

12. The learned counsel has relied on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chandra Kishore Jha Vs. Mahavir Prasad & Ors., reported in (1999) 8 SCC 266 (para 17) and OPTO Circuits (India) Ltd. Vs. Axis Bank, (2021) 6 SCC 707 wherein, it was held that it is a well-settled salutary Page No.# 9/18 2025:GAU-MZ:291 principle that if a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other manner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 112 - A S Bopanna - Full Document
1