Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)

Unison Metals Ltd. vs C.C.E., Ahmedabad I [Alongwith Central ... on 4 October, 2006

In support of their contention, the assessee placed reliance on the decision of the larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of 6 Unison Metals Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-1, [2006 (204)ELT 323 (Tri.LD)]. The learned Tribunal considered the factual position and found that the reversal of the amount was done by the assessee's Belgharia unit from where the couplers and bogies were collected without payment of duty by the assessee and there was no dispute about the reversal of 8% or 10%. Furthermore, the Tribunal on facts noted that the amounts were duly debited by the Belgharia unit in terms of Rule 6(3) of the Rules and it was not alleged that the Belgharia unit raised any demand for recovery of the said amount separately from where it was recovered through the bill and they have been paid. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted that in the assesseess's own case in Excise Appeal No.465/2007, dated 13.5.2016, the appeal was allowed by relying upon the decision of the larger Bench in the case of Unison Metals Ltd. Therefore, the learned Tribunal accepted the case of the assessee and dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 22 - Full Document

M/S. Kesoram Spun Pipes And Foundries ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & Ors on 15 March, 2019

13. In the instant case, the assessee has adopted the CENVAT credit account and has remitted the amount. Whether this procedure can be followed would be another issue. Such issue came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kesoram Spun Pipes And Foundries Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Ors., APO No.391 of 2017, GA No.2872 of 2017 in WPO No.681 of 2014 and by judgment dated 15.3.2019 the assessee's appeal was allowed and the order passed in the writ petition was set aside. At this juncture, it would be relevant to take note of the following paragraphs of the said judgment.
Calcutta High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - S Banerjee - Full Document
1